|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
89.216.145.249
hope my question is clear: i would love to eliminate every posibility for any further sonic degradation in a TVC preamp i'm considering building. i can live even with a single input but i would still feel a bit more relaxed with 2 or 3 in total, 1 XLR.do you think it would be possible to wire them without a selector switch on a signal path. as i am not listening more than 1 level at the same time, i don't see why this wouldn't be possible, or am i wrong?
Follow Ups:
It would be better if U implemented a high quality selector switch.The unused "open" input lines that would be connected at all times in the scenario U propose above, will be susceptible to adding all kinds of noise pollution/RF to the input signal and that noise will be mixed in the source signal......not good.
IME, it would be far better to implement a high quality selector switch such as the DACT CT3 and use RCA/XLR shorting plugs, or at the very least, RCA/XLR plug caps on the unused inputs.
Cheers,
In a minimalist passive, some claim best results with an audio-quality 4PDT or bigger switch (such as E-Switch), but using two paths through the switch simultaneously for each signal phase.
I think a rotary selector switch like a ELMA or even better a Shallco is not too much of a comprimise to the sound. It saves the wear and tear on cable connectors. Switching both hot and ground, you can use a ganged rotary (2 deck/6 pos/2 pole) and implement a 3 inputs w/ inverted phase on alternate positions. I find that phase is clearly audible and varies from one recording to another. The ability switch phase is essential to get the best sound, and switching at the input of a transformer is the easiest and least intrusive way of implementing this capablity.
Doh!! Now I can claim to have had a reason for buying those switches with more positions than I needed.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: