|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.174.99.84
In Reply to: So in other words posted by unclestu52 on April 8, 2007 at 03:44:19:
Listen very carefully here: Just because you have no knowledge of basic electrical theory does not mean I have to test for certain conditions that are already known NOT to exist. Take a course in AC electronics 101 please, it would be a great service to not only your customers, but yourself.
This reminds of what many techniclly ignorant high enders call being
"open minded". There's a difference between being open minded and ignorance of already known electrical properties.
Puhlease!
d.b.
Follow Ups:
I had already stated that the Bybees have the greatest effect on sound when placed after inductive devices. I am not concerned with the inductance of the Bybee itself. I am asking the question: could the Bybee alter the current/voltage phase relationships of the preceding inductive device and if you have tested for this hypothesis. The inductance of the Bybee, being minimal as per your testing, would not affect the phase relationship by adding inductance which would, in my thinking, actually increase the phase shift, at least from the basic physics I have taken on the university level.I asked a fairly simple question. It is of no relevance to your honor or integrity if you haven't tested for this hypothesis. I am not trying to impugn your intentions or observations. I am asking because I believe most designers work with voltage amplification and often neglect the effects of current and its relationship to voltage. The fact that power factor correction is growing in importance means that we may have to consider that equivalent in the generation of an active AC signal. It is much more difficut with a continuously variable AC signal, though. I know of no work that analyzes this voltage/amperage relationship, and I believe the instrumentation required would be quite costly. It would be no shame to say that you haven't done so.
You do not know the purpose of the ceramic tube, and I am simply making an observation from my usage. If you, in all your wisdom, can proclaim that there is absolutely no way that any of the components used in the construction of the Bybee can alter this relationship, just say so.
When I got the first units in, I was very sceptical myself. But I tried them and heard a difference. With more experimentation, I got better in determining where best to get their maximum benefits. It wasn't exactly easy and Jack does not hand out any installation manuals. My observations are simply that, and based on my experience. and through a lot of trial and error.
But if I may make one observation, Jack is still selling his devices with a guarantee and you are not. Perhaps there may be a sucker born every minute, but he sells and you are not, and that says something, especially since he did give me a 100% money back guarantee.
Stu, I don't think that the Bybee can change the voltage-current relationship directly, It has too low of resistance, inductance, and capacitance to do so. However, it 'might' change the 'state' of some of the electrons that have been made this way by the highly reactive impedance that is present. This is only a guess about the electron state, but there is more to the Bybee than has been discussed, so far, on this website.
and he has security clearance, so apparently Bybee told him far more than he can tell most people, calls the purifiers a new class of electronic devices: neither resister, capacitor, transister, nor inductor. It sort of forces you to rethink things, and I would guess that no conventional eletronics can adequately describe what the purifiers are doing. It's food for thought, however.
Now you understand the problem. I could 'hint' further, but I would just make Jack unhappy. It isn't worth it
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: