|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
212.42.175.73
In Reply to: Re: Audio note caps reliablity posted by Mahatma Kane Jeeves on March 30, 2007 at 00:54:38:
Dear MKJ,In the largely one dimensional world of mass production the measures you mention are generally the ones governing quality, and if one is making a refrigirator or toaster then they are fine as measures.
We define quality in this regard as sound quality, and whilst consistency and reliability are important measures as well, at the end of the day a specialist part or product has to be defined by how it performs within its defined brief.
Follow Ups:
"We define quality in this regard as sound quality"So how good does an amp with out of spec caps or burnt output tubes sound?
I'm reminded of the old line about Jaguar: "Every part that falls off is of the finest British workmanship."
Dear MKJ,The small percantage of caps that fail, don't sound great, that is true and as a former Jaguar owner myself all I can say is that it is sad that the genius that created the cars was not matched by an equivalent ability to build them.
The point here is that any small volume production item which attempts to expand the envelope in some respect will always suffer from more variability than large scale industrial production items made to a price, and what it comes down to in the end equation is how well it performs within its brief.
It is a very easy argument to just look at what something does not do, how about looking at what it does do well and then seek to reduce the failure rate, that is after all what originally created the cheap mass produced parts that you touted earlier once upon a time.
The Mahatma has missed the point me thinks. A capacitor is very much more than its 1/Wc and ESR and as for 6 sigma lets leave that to the anal retentives who enjoy that sort of thing
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: