|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: well, gee. . . posted by Bruce from DC on September 10, 2002 at 12:53:40:
or so it seems.YOU brought up the question of "Protect Moniker", not me. As I stated it has always been checked as far as I know(and still is). So, if this is a technical question and you want an answer, then please check this out and kindly inform us.I did not make this post as a "technical question", that is your assessment of it. IT IS NOT A TECHNICAL QUESTION. As far as I am concerned this is a question of why an obvious Rule Violation is allowed and why one Cannot receive a reasonable respose within a reasonable time period !!! How many times should I mention that I first brought this to whomever's attention on August 13,2002 ? There should be some system in writing as to how "comments" are to be handled. There is no such thing now. Every comment should receive a response, regardless of it's perceived merrit. If you are going to sh..can a comment because someone doesn't like its "tone" then put that in writing.
I too work but that shouldn't preclude a response in 4 weeks.
Follow Ups:
could you guys take this to a more appropriate place?No offense or anything, but there are better ways to go about getting problems resolved, MEP.
if you read my posts, you can see that I received no response. If you ask for a response and recive none then you have to conclude that you aren't going to recive one. This whole topic involves the Audio Asylum, procedures, responses, rule violations, etc. If that isn't germain to the Audio Asylum, then I don't know what is.
> > If you are going to sh..can a comment because someone
doesn't like its "tone" then put that in writing.I will sh..can a comment if I don't like its tone.
My guess, based on the actions of other moderators
is that they will, too.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: