|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: What I think is that there's something fishy here. posted by Bruce from DC on September 10, 2002 at 11:19:12:
TRolling My ASS. Only you could see something suspicious, but then that does not surprise me. The 2 instances can be clearly seen with a minumum of effort. They could be clearly seen by the Moderators, or whoever supposedly checks these things when I brought it too their attention. I made my "comment" both times while these posts were on the first page of the forum and could be clearly verified.All you have to do is look at the IP address. Go back to 8-13-02 and look at his post. He admits in the post that he is using my Username and states how easy it is to post under another's Username. Did he hack in? I don't know, why don't you ask him ??? Now, Bruce, you who is Always referring others to the archives, you do know how to check this don't you??? Check your facts, Bruce, before you make accusations.
As far as I know, my Username has always been protected, that is, I don't remember doing anything specific after I originally registered. Again, why would you dwell on whether I protected it or not? The fact that he knowingly and intentionally posted twice under my Username is what is important. It is a clear violation of the rules...period.
What you are saying is it would be my falult if I were robbed because I did not install iron bars on all my windows and the robber gained entry by breaking through a window??? That is a twisted sense of logic.
As I clearly stated in the text all I wanted was a response to my comments. This is a very reasonable expectation given the circumstances. Had I received a response, I would not have posted anything concerning this matter.
Bruce, why do you appear to be taking this so personally and why are you so defensive??? I wanted an explaination to a matter that was serious to me and is a clear violation of the rules.
Tell me Bruce, what would you have done? Knowing your nature I can just imagaine you passing it off like it was nothing.
This smacks of another situation where if someone says something you don't like, it is a "troll". I am not attacking AA, I merely want an explaination to my inquiry, which as I noted, I have not recived. If anyone is "Whining" here, I say it is you.
All I did is clearly state the facts as they occured. Since it appears that I am not entitled to an explaination, I wanted to know how others would react to the same thing happening to them.That seems reasonable to me. Tell us Bruce, a Board Member, what would you have done?
Follow Ups:
Perfect example of someone who gets MAD when somebody buys Bose speakers. :0
[see thread below]
"Honey, that's the same amp we have always had, I swear!!"
Hmmm, if this is not about hi-fi, then it's serious!
IMHO, your question, then, is a technical one -- why doesn't "protect moniker" protect you from Big Dave? I don't know the anwer; I'm not a computer guy.But there are any number of places to have continued this inquiry that would be more appropriate than General Asylum.
Such as
*an e-mail to the webmaster (since it is technical)
*a post on the support forum
You might keep in mind that all of the people who run this site have "day jobs" and so they can't respond instantly or immediately to a problem.
or so it seems.YOU brought up the question of "Protect Moniker", not me. As I stated it has always been checked as far as I know(and still is). So, if this is a technical question and you want an answer, then please check this out and kindly inform us.I did not make this post as a "technical question", that is your assessment of it. IT IS NOT A TECHNICAL QUESTION. As far as I am concerned this is a question of why an obvious Rule Violation is allowed and why one Cannot receive a reasonable respose within a reasonable time period !!! How many times should I mention that I first brought this to whomever's attention on August 13,2002 ? There should be some system in writing as to how "comments" are to be handled. There is no such thing now. Every comment should receive a response, regardless of it's perceived merrit. If you are going to sh..can a comment because someone doesn't like its "tone" then put that in writing.
I too work but that shouldn't preclude a response in 4 weeks.
could you guys take this to a more appropriate place?No offense or anything, but there are better ways to go about getting problems resolved, MEP.
if you read my posts, you can see that I received no response. If you ask for a response and recive none then you have to conclude that you aren't going to recive one. This whole topic involves the Audio Asylum, procedures, responses, rule violations, etc. If that isn't germain to the Audio Asylum, then I don't know what is.
> > If you are going to sh..can a comment because someone
doesn't like its "tone" then put that in writing.I will sh..can a comment if I don't like its tone.
My guess, based on the actions of other moderators
is that they will, too.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: