|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
Audio Physics says their drivers operate like a point source. Revel talks about their drivers achieving "true pistonic" movement. Which is better? It doesn't seem that Revel's inverted domes could operate as a point source.
From what I've gathered a point source will give wider dispersion and is the only way to get the true tonal decay (or tonality) of a musical note.
Does anyone know which is better or what is trying to be acheived by these design methods?
Thanks
Follow Ups:
nt
Hi ChuckTrue pistonic movement has to do with the cone and cone-break-up modes. This just means that the cone keeps its shape throughout the forward (and rearward) sound propagation.
Point source has to do with the point where the sound originates. Single-cone (or full-range if you want) drivers are the best example of this. All the sound originates from a single point (hence point source).
So in the first case it has to do with the mechanics of the cone, and in the second it has to do with sound-source. A point-source driver or speaker can have drivers with 'true pistonic movement' too :-) I'm sure there are others who can explain this much better than I can, so I will leave it to them from here.
point source and have good pistonic behavior
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: