|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Are you write very good but it's joke, right? posted by Oz K on May 29, 2003 at 02:14:54:
Oz K,It might be true that DM604S2 were designed w/ HT in mind but that doesn't mean that they cannot sound good in 2-ch setup! So, no, this is not a joke!!! In *my* system these speakers sound very good. I've had many people come over & listen & they have said the same thing - they sound very good!
I'm *not* saying that it is the best speaker & that it is the last word in neutrality or resolution. It is not! I know that so I will not be foolish to say such a thing.
However, I have very good electronics & lots of *clean* power amplification. This must be making a difference in my setup.
It is possible that you do not like the B&W sound. That's fine! Doesn't mean that the sound is bad.
Follow Ups:
The electronics in this system are no slouch by any means. This is the ONLY system I have ever heard in which I could deal with the sound of the B&W 600 series speakers.My only comment is that with all that wonderful hardware, and the analog playback system, and the nice cable, the speakers are way outclassed. I can only imagine how great that system would sound with higher caliber speakers.
And one more thing. I agree about the CDM series. I hated them too, and I listened to them in my own system. . .
Bombaywalla,My friend have B&W 604S2. he like them too.
But i not talking on the sound. i mean that 604 not similar to Nautilus and Martin Logan in nothing. it's like say that B&W 604 similar to Audio Note Kondo... ;-)
I have owned the 601's, 602's, 603's, (S2 - S3) CDM's, Nautilus's.I love the sound of B&W. Your review comes across as some high end Audiophile Speaker. Yes they are good, but not compared to the Nautilus or Logans. There is no similarity, is my point.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: