|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
202.172.104.29
In Reply to: I get different DHT effects posted by andy evans on March 21, 2007 at 10:09:55:
My home brew Phono / Line stage drives my SETs and it exclusively uses IDHTs. It also happens to enhance the 3D effect more than any other Phono stage I've tried, providing exceptional detail and HF response.Funny you should mention DHTs and tone. I tried 26s in lieu of both 6922 and 6H30P in my Phono stage and contrary to other opinions thought that the result was not as extended as the IDHTs. Although the 26 had a nice midrange tone overall I preferred the latter. Interestingly some of the 3D effect was also lost with the 26. I've observed this with many DHTs including some very popular tubes and maybe the right mix of DHT tubes is most important in an all DHT design to prevent limiting HF response too much. My take is that good HF response is a must for holographic imaging but the immediacy of SETs is perhaps the major contributor.
Like you, I too achieved some of the effect with PP but only where the OP tubes were wired in triode mode, which also happened to provide greater immediacy. I'm certain that you can produce 3D to a greater or lesser degree with most types of tubes and even topologies but I think SETs do it better than anything else. DHTs with good HF response work well but if the design implementation is skewed mainly towards great midrange tone at the expense of HF, some "space" will be lost. Often IS coupling is the culprit here unless VERY good trannies are used.
I still think that phase preservation is a must and this stacks up technically with extended HF and little or no global feedback. But but on reflection I think you are right about IDHTs to some extent and perhaps my explanation of frequency and phase response remains consistent with your findings. Maybe a mix of both DHT and IDHT brings about a great marriage in this regard.
Follow Ups:
The lack of treble in the 26 has been referred to by a few people - it does appear a bit flat on top. For a full sound with good top, try the 12A or 01A, or the 30 which has excellent top but a rather thinner sound. There are some distinct flavours in the DHT cookbook. I'd suggest you experiment a bit more with a greater range of DHTs. I went through a load of them by using bench supplies for the filaments - I just dialled in the right voltage and swapped tubes. I've personally found some nice mixes of DHT that I find promising. The cheapest is the 3A5 which is really peanuts - not the best, but pretty good indeed. Useful double triode, which could probably mate well with another double DHT the 1J6 as a driver. Must try that.I must take a look at SET - never had one but not too hard to build and I have the parts. I hang out here to discuss DHTs!!!
Is a match made in heaven.I have 26's driving various output tubes and I'm a big fan of the tube. But it leads to something very special, perhaps unique with the 45.
I've been talking to Josh about a GM100 driving a 2A3. :)Can you say MUTANT?
Maybe a GM100 linestage....
I did try a 2a3 linestage, but it wasn't the equal of some of the other small DHTs. Others have tried 300b linestages. Haven't heard of a 211 or 845 linestage yet!!
Have you tried 10/801 or 316?These make up very good linestage amps.
There are some radio transmitter tubes, that are 6ft tall, and crank out over 1000W in SE deep class A. Those would make quite a line stage! :)))10 kilovolts on the plate, generate enough X-rays to kill anyone within 20 feet overnight.... sadly, the death of a janitor who mopped the transmitter room on top of the Emipre State Building lead to the discovery that 5+ kilovolts on the plate generate humongous amounts of X-rays..... enough to ignite A-bombs. Special tubes that had focused x-ray bombardment were developed for that puprose........ probably pretty powerful sounding for that split second before the blast. ;)
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: