|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
198.144.206.5
In Reply to: Did you post that link to the Amazon article on the $200 Bob Lind album? posted by Duilawyer on January 25, 2007 at 06:11:29:
and since you are such an idiot, here it is again.
Scroll down to the comments.
Do you want mayo on that crow?
- http://www.amazon.com/Since-There-Were-Circles-Lind/dp/B000HXDXK4/sr=8-1/qid=1169735096/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-4448155-9581464?ie=UTF8&s=music (Open in New Window)
Follow Ups:
Gene Clark appears on the album; IT IS NOT a Gene Clark album, anymore than it is a Dillards album.
- Who could doubt your reliability and honesty? Poor woman had a teenage daughter.. (Open in New Window)
like an ordinary person who claimed he was interested you would have seen that it is a Lind CD and that Clark is on it. I flagged Clarks name in the title of my post because there are Gene Clark collectors here and I wanted to call attention to the fact that here was a rare newbie.
According to your logic, only original members of a band should be using that band name. How about bands that use differing guest artists or differing back up musicians on each album? Should they be called the same name with several different line ups on each record?
Here is what I think, your opinion of what bands call themselves has no meaning to even just one band or any particular artist. In other words Dewey, you still do not matter .
making it unhospitable to other readers. Imagine if you had just posted a link following the rules instead of being a dick about it. Weird others have to carry your water.
is that you are too fucking lazy to do a search. That is all you have to do.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: