|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
69.209.221.97
In Reply to: The ElectroClear QRT (whose mode of operation is unspecified) evidently fills the room (as it were) with... posted by clarkjohnsen on April 24, 2007 at 09:53:43:
...is more palatable than makebelieve.
Follow Ups:
x
You endorse it.cheers,
AJ
The threshold for disproving something is higher than the threshold for saying it, which is a recipe for the accumulation of bullshit - Softky
...I've found that if you guys berate something, it's a pretty good bet that there's a nice benefit to be found with that particular product. It's almost like dowsing. ;-)
I'm not that familiar with witchcraft. Is it dangerous to cross or combine spells/rituals like that? Does it always have a positive psychotic effect? Never negative?cheers,
AJ
BTW, where does Shrek get electricity from - in the forest??
The threshold for disproving something is higher than the threshold for saying it, which is a recipe for the accumulation of bullshit - Softky
This is just a general guideline is all. Not enough hours in the day for EVERYTHING. You've just confirmed via the science of sceptic reading that there's potential in those two things. Thanks. ;-)
Why not a high end power cord on the refrigerator itself, along with brass isolation feet, while freezing the grinded cd with the intelligent chip attached? Shouldn't the cumulative effect be ridiculously stunning improvement, heard by the wife while pulling into the driveway, instead of complete masking by reality tests like ABX, etc?
Or is there a sugar pill glass ceiling or brick wall effect, where no amount of voodoo rituals can break the performance barrier? Can one seance negate the effect of another to the point of cancellation?
Is there any paranormal research in underground audiophile laboratories into this type of counterbalancing phenomenon?cheers,
AJ
The threshold for disproving something is higher than the threshold for saying it, which is a recipe for the accumulation of bullshit - Softky
What is it about tweaks, tweakers, and tweakery that disturbs you so deeply?
Cause it's so darn funny. Why not laugh at it?
Now have you tried replacing your refrigerator power cord and feet with high end products, before freezing the grinded discs, or are you going to be like those ignorant rationalists (aka subjectivists)and insist that you don't have to experience something firsthand to know that it is absurd rubbish?cheers,
AJ
The threshold for disproving something is higher than the threshold for saying it, which is a recipe for the accumulation of bullshit - Softky
...and leave it at that. :-)
What is your obsession with tweaking?? Why don't you just improve the actual parts of the system making the sound??
What makes you think you don't need one to intelligently, and productively, comment upon tweaks?What is your obsession with tweaking??
Great sound. I'll take that from just about any source I can justify. I'm fairly liberal in this area, as you might imagine. ;-)
Can't deny that I'm blessed with great sound though. Hallelujah. :-)
You can read more about "Beltism" at the link below. I'm sure your familiar with the "rag" that publishes this.
d.b.
Yeah I am familiar with it, its the same one that gave you a "rave" review. Tell me Dan, did they have a Clever little clock in the room at the time of your amp test?? Maybe that is why they viewed it so favorably. Maybe the slathered it in electret cream and wrote with a red x pen "Dan's amp good" on a piece of paper taped to it. MAYBE you sent them two photos of yourself and they were in the freezer during the review?Will you be retracting that review from your website now? Oh look its still there:
http://www.redesignsaudio.com/PosFeed.html
LOL!
Your reading comprehension appears to have enough holes to call it swiss cheese. Really; you guys are the laughing stock of the modern world.
d.b.
What's the date got to do with it, DanO? Same publisher, David Robinson and the issue is listed on the website: http://www.positive-feedback.com/pfbackissues/pfbackissues.htmGuess your webbrowser wasn't working so well, eh DanO?
Hell, even got your favorite guy, Clark writing for them then. I guess you weren't as concerned about the CLC as you are now though. LOL!
See link below
nt
s
As far as I know, there is no "Belt phenomena". Care to explain before elevating something imagined to hoax status?
s
nt
:-)
Did you really think anything was left to probe for?
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: