|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
76.16.75.85
In Reply to: Re: 21st Century Science posted by May Belt on April 6, 2007 at 02:08:37:
Hi MayYou speak of a real phenomena common among most academics I have dealt with, it is the result of an “intellectual purchase”.
At several times at Intersonics, I (not having a formal education) was directing the efforts of a number of scientists and engineers working on new electronics for experimental hardware for NASA.
My old boss used to say an advantage I had in technical problem solving was that I didn’t already know what didn’t work and so I was free to think in any direction.
Highschool was terrible for me, took 5 years to get through taking every shop class I could and while taking a “work study” class that let me work at a TV store.
I had been interested in speakers and electronics since I was little and that was my hobby all my life. I survived foolish young adulthood and at 24 decided I would try to learn more of the scientific parts of things and ugh, some math which was the worst.
I got a Commodore Vic20, taught my self GW basic and how to do some math and the world of LF horns began to open up.
About 12 years later, after doing electronics repair and building speakers, I got the Job at Intersonics.I don’t know if that is true but how Roy Whymark my old boss described the general scheme was dead on most of the time. His perspective was from a WWII acoustician who worked on the Sonar and radar systems at Mullard labs in England.
Anyway, the point is that the act of going to get a formal education gives one confidence in being equipped with the tools and knowledge to deal with nearly anything.
Most people embrace that feeling of confidence and apply it generally to areas they don’t have specific knowledge in and then make reflexive judgments and fail to consider that there are often complications which makes the case not the one considered in the class examples..
Roy loved the idea that out of all the scientists, engineers, 17 out of the 18 Patents the company held, were originated by a 5 year High school grad.
At that point, with the Servodrive speaker division running, I guess I felt like I had finally overcome High school.Anyway, everyone makes intellectual purchases, they invest in some idea or direction and then also become partially blind to the possible minutia which may invert / alter the image.
May, I have read a number of your posts and you are totally serious about sound.
Yet, we are clearly on two different parts of the planet so far as the concept of how things work. Also, nothing I could say to you or you to me will cause us to significantly alter our positions, largely because of the “purchase” we each made getting here but your willingness to respond here shows the door is not nailed shut.I would say the greatest danger anyone interested in all this faces is that most of the technical understanding of how hifi products work, come from the people who make them or help sell them. This places a high probability that this “information” will be shaped or even contrived to most effectively “sell” the product. Those who profit are of course fully able to claim anything and go full BS or reality or anywhere in between.
I don’t know if you were around when the power wars were going on but an old example of manufacturers totally lying by orders of magnitude.Business is math if you make a wood block (or knob) that cost 60 cents to make, 2 dollars to package slickly and sell it for 350 bucks, you don’t have to reach a significant slice of the market to have a profitable cottage business.
Wild improbable claims don’t need to be proven in areas of human perception and discretionary spending and while they only appeal to a small percentage of the whole, that is enough to make money.
Business is a science, it is a plain fact that a dollar spent marketing an image of technology has more return that spending a dollar on real R&D.
Look to the biggest, most profitable audio companies, then think of how there products rank and yes I mean they stink.Sadly, if you really want to know how things work, you have to start with what is known from a science perspective.
As with all areas of science human perception is too weak and subject to influence to trust entirely, removing potential non experiment related influences is the solution seemingly everywhere but hi end hifi.
As with the PEAR labs example, it is possible to do everything right. “prove” a result with blind testing BUT if an experimental proof isn’t universally reproducible, even by people who might not want it to work, it still doesn’t go into the “big book of science”.This is why starting with what is “known” and measuring is a good place to start but keeping in mind, this usually has nothing at all to do with the retail hifi business or magazines say and while science information is mostly complete, has some holes and may have thin coverage in places due to simplifications..
Once you get a good understanding of the principals and have built / measured enough to imagine systems of principals in your head, then you can come up with systems of new things, invention.
Thankfully, what ever you think you hear, it is often possible to remove the knowledge of what your hearing and then one is left to judge with ones ears alone.If anyone selling something or helping to sell things tells you about some cool new thing that sounds improbable, there should be a little robot off the corner of your mind saying “ Danger Danger Will Robinson, its Dr. Smith again and he is smiling”
Keep in mind some things work because of that mental purchase, a non hifi example is the famous Gas line magnetizer.
It has no effect at all on the gasoline or combustion but most people get better mileage. Subconsciously, the act of investing (consisting of both a $ purchase AND putting it on yourself) is a mental message of expectation which then subconsciously alters there driving habits. In audio, dare I suggest the little wood blocks, speaker wire towers, magic chips fall in this category too? That is, they cause a change that is unrelated to the physical operation of any of the gear, that probably would not be detectable in blind test.
Best,Tom Danley
On a clear disk….You can seek forever…
Follow Ups:
Even NASA, as great as they may be, screws up from time to time, e.g., Challenger disaster (among many others). Sometimes experiments, like Shuttle launches, cannot be "universally replicated" for unseen or unexpected reasons - which is actually one of the conclusions of the PEAR group.
> > > "May, I have read a number of your posts and you are totally serious about sound.Sadly, if you really want to know how things work, you have to start with what is known from a science perspective." < < <
Thank you for your courteousness Tom, but you really should have been more aware about our technical background before giving me a lecture on technical aspects of audio !!
Peter was a radio engineer in the RAF and after that he and I have been involved the world of audio for the past 52 years. 30 of those years involved audio equipment retailing and in manufacturing our own range of moving coil, orthodynamic and electrostatic headphones and loudspeakers !!!!!!!!
You say you have been involved with loudspeakers. I personally worked out and drew out an 8 ohm coil for an orthodynamic diaphragm, ready for etching, to fit the magnetic structure of the Strathearn orthodynamic panel speaker - whilst Strathearn were still cutting a quarter ohm coil - by hand - from aluminium foil and sticking it onto a mylar sheet - by hand !!! And, in addition, they then had to use a step up transformer to get this quarter ohm coil up to 8 ohms to match it into the amplifier !!!!
I have been involved in all aspects of audio, by Peter's side, for 52 years !! From the years of valves only (no transistors) and mono (before stereo).!!!
25 years ago our life changed. This was when Peter SUDDENLY found that he had the best sound he had ever had in his life !!!!! The rest of the story is well known.
So. Tom, in answer to your sentence "If you want to know how things work !!!"
I DO !!! But, thanks again for your courtesy.
Hi May
“So. Tom, in answer to your sentence "If you want to know how things work !!!"
I DO !!! But, thanks again for your courtesy.”Well May, I would have to say I have not reached that level where I can say I know how everything works, in fact, it usually appears that the more you know about something, the more you realize there are things you don’t know.
While I have not worked in the “hifi” market, other than working for Grommes precision in the 70’s (tube amplifiers) in engineering and repair, all of my life has been involved in solving technical / acoustic / electronic problems and I did contribute a few times to the late Audio magazine. My hobby and keenest area of interest happens to be hifi and building loudspeakers and drivers, so yes like I said I work with speakers.I would like to think that the approach of using science and measurement as key elements to design is useful. So far as the obligatory technical penis waving in return, at Intersonics, I designed and built major sections of several experiments flown on the two space shuttle flights and sounding rockets, including the acoustic levitation transducers and power amplifier / control electronics. In addition to NASA work, I worked on projects as weird as measuring the resonance in pecan shells to the thickness of the carbon layer at the bottom of a working blast furnace (with sound) in US Steel in Gary Indiana. I also started the Servodrive speaker division with a loudspeaker I invented, one of which even eventually helped Joyce Poole at Cornell U. establish low frequency elephant communication for National Geographic.
We took on some hard jobs too, I designed a sonic boom simulator of massive proportions and several smaller ones for NASA research. This had to be waveshape accurate, not just ridiculously large.http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/1993/PV1993_4430.pdf
All of this was in new ground where there was nothing you could look up, when the job is “hard” you run out of ways to do it. Ask your husband, how do you pass 300 Amps through a one turn coil, 3/8 inch id at 12 – 14 MHz, without an ensuing fire. It turns out you can electromagnetically levitate glass a “non conductor” with a 3 phase version.
For the last 9 years I have been designing commercial sound loudspeakers exclusively for a living but we did take on a Military “subwoofer” project recently we called the Matterhorn. While not a hifi speaker, the spec required low distortion, its dimensions may provide a laugh. Click on the construction video link.
http://www.danleysoundlabs.com/matterhorn.htm
This gives an idea what I have been up to in the past
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&client=firefox-a&q="Thomas+j+danley"+patents&btnG=Search
And now where our speaker are used in commercial sound
http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&hl=en&q=danley+sound+labs&btnG=Google+Search
And my solution to the “how to make a time coherent full range horn dilemma” or “how to make a small bass horn with nice response and group delay?”
http://www.danleysoundlabs.com/pdf/danley_tapped.pdf
None of this “new stuff” would be possible for me to conceive or design without using facts from the “book of science” and computer models that count on fixed relationships that “always” happen. .
It is the rare exception when something doesn’t fit when all the fine details are accounted for.
I ask, how much real innovation is there in home hifi?
How often do “new” ways of doing things really come along?
Lacking those, what else can a manufacturer, marketer or salesman do to create demand / sales?
Best,
Tom Danley
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: