|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.116.186.171
In Reply to: Re: What do you listen for? posted by Jim Austin on March 23, 2007 at 14:20:00:
...as I'm always looking for objective evidence of change.One track I like to use for this is "Symbol In My Driveway" from Jack Johnson's "On and On" title. The first 30 seconds or so of this track is all I usually need to spot resolution and soundstage changes. Sometimes change is subtle and requires repeated listenings to determine if ANYthing worthwhile occurred. Other times, changes can be quite dramatic.
Geoff Kait's Brilliant Pebbles accessory situated on ceramic tile 'tables' in the 'right' locations is an example of dramatic. Thought I'd squeeze in a little advertisement for Geoff here. ;-)
Follow Ups:
but in a most uncareful way, wellfed. Don't worry you are in no danger of becoming a "scientist" :).
I'm quite happy with my mere scientist status. So I don't do DBT's; whoopdedoo! You quote/unquote scientists can have them, and take your so-called placebo effect with you. ;-)
"I'm quite happy with my mere scientist status"
The scientist is a lover of truth for the very love of truth itself, wherever it may lead. — Luther Burbank (1849-1926), American plant breeder, botanist, naturalist.Not the other kind. ;-)
Note especially the 'wherever it may lead' portion of Burbank's quote. The scientist doesn't control that part if they're looking for truth. It takes a little effort, but it's a fun and rewarding pastime.
"Not the other kind. ;-)"Sorry, Wellfed, there is no other kind of scientist...at least not early in their career. Later with age all people become more conservative but that doesn't mean the new ideas don't get through! Just more likely that the new idea is really something good and hype.
"Note especially the 'wherever it may lead' portion of Burbank's quote. The scientist doesn't control that part if they're looking for truth. It takes a little effort, but it's a fun and rewarding pastime.
"Again, I just don't think you get this really. Whereever it may lead is coming from the fact that often an unexpected result of an experiment is more interesting than if you get an expected result. However; once an anamalous observation is made, every effort is then given to make sure that it wasn't a failure, bias, or artifact in the experiment itself first, then to try to reproduce it (under CONTROLLED conditions). If it is reproducible under one set of conditions then what about other conditions. Determining the boundaries as it were. If it passes these tests then an attempt to determine what it means can be undertaken. This is what "whereever it may lead" means.
So while you have the intent of exploration you are not really approaching it with the skeptical mindset of a true scientist. Of course they too get excited by new results...and then they sober up and find out if the observation was really the result of something new or if it was a flaw in the experiment somehow. Face value is not an accepted aspect of exprimental science.
...while there's an emergency going on.We better turn our attention to the science used in the following post.
Looks like libel to me, but I'm not a lawyer.
I don't follow your conclusion at all.In what way is "Scientific Method losing ground" ?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: