|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
70.80.148.226
In Reply to: The JREF Challenge is not real... posted by Wellfed on March 11, 2007 at 22:10:48:
Someone did try to win the million using the IC and failed. So you think they were affraid of you ? They actually know that the chip works ? They are covering-up the evidences ?
Follow Ups:
...is that they were afraid of the test being limited to 10 iterations. This being outside what they'd have preferred from a statistical standpoint.Contrary to what AJinFLA would like to believe, I didn't run away from the Challenge. I simply put the matter on hold after it became apparent that Kramer was incapable of negotiating in good faith.
I had a number of personal events slated to occur over the summer of '05 that I wasn't willing to have disturbed by the acrimony and uncertainty JREF created in the negotiations. The most significant being the anticipated birth of my first grandchild.
The straw that broke the camels back was this assertion from Kramer on the JREF Forum
Good One !!!
[Quote:
Originally posted by Wellfed
I have considered being my own observer...]That's a good one, and an entirely different paranormal claim. You'll have to send in a new application...especially since I haven't heard a peep from you since last week when you promised a new protocol within hours.
A most curious, deafening silence.
Oh, and by the way, Piano Teacher is who he claims to be.
Did anyone here really accuse him of being something else?
If so, I must have missed it.The reality of the matter is I had written to him via email twice the previous day dealing with a sticking point involving the protocol, one of the correspondences he actually responded back to me on. A most curious bit of bullshit, wouldn't you say?
Also, the sticking point I refer to was created by JREF, AFTER I had promised that a revised protocol would be forthcoming shortly. He knew only too well that I was working on a solution to the protocol vanity that JREF themselves had introduced. He also chose to twist the 'my own observer' comment, the context of which being discussion of what it would take for me to drop my own requirement of having my own observer present to monitor the integrity of the JREF testers. The JREF Forum integrity concern being that my own observer could conceivably alert me by the use of bird calls emanating from a loudspeaker set up outside my home.
Bear in mind that this 'crisis' is only one example showing JREF incapable of negotiating in good faith. This came on the heals of another battle that established that I was only required to do 10 identifications, per my original claim.
I could go on... If you are truly interested in learning the truth, I will.
x
You're gonna' love me. That's a given. :-)
--
The threshold for disproving something is higher than the threshold for saying it, which is a recipe for the accumulation of bullshit - Softky
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: