|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.26.121.245
In Reply to: Well, what do you expect? He personalizes many issues. posted by Pat D on March 9, 2007 at 16:25:55:
PD - And he's obviously overly obsessed with you.Indeed. A rather unhealthy habit IMHO.
cheers,
AJ
The threshold for disproving something is higher than the threshold for saying it, which is a recipe for the accumulation of bullshit - Softky
Follow Ups:
POLLYinFLA,I'm hardly obsessed with you. I just have a low tolerance towards accepting the bullshit that you post...
Yeah, that's true, too.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
Pat D-Cake,If you & your fellow lunatic fringe objectivists spent 1/10th of time you take to twist the truth, mis-direct and evade the topic at hand, i.e. Objectivists LIE when they say Subjectivists believe all measurements are useless, by clearly and directly answering questions you're asked. It wouldn't have to be this way.
And act accordingly.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
Pat,Even when I address you civilly you act like a horses pa-toot! I know quite well the difference between "SOME" & "EVERY!" In fact it's because I understand that difference that I understood how idiotic it was for one of your fellow lunatic-fringe objectivists to proclaim and I quote! "“…you (TG1954)consider them (measurements) useless and meaningless, because we really can't measure everything, so we might as well measure nothing and just listen with the trusty ol' ghost hearing measurement devices only, the ears.”
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/29643.html
See Pat it appears it's this lunatic-fringe objectivist who appears uncapable of understanding when I don't find "SOME" of todays accepted audio measurements useful, that doesn't mean I believe "EVERY" audio measurement is useless! Now if you spent as much time correcting your fellow lunatic-fringe objectivists when they make such moronic comments as you do trying to discredit my post for bringing this to everyone's attention, we might actually get somewhere.
Interestingly enough I noticed you still continue to do exactly what I say lunatic fringe objectivists do, i.e. mis-direct the topic by evading the actual topic at hand, which is: Objectivists LIE when they say: SUBJECTIVISTS THINK ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE USELESS Why not try discussing the actual topic or is that too complicated for you?
You don't act as though you understand the difference between "some" and "every." Stop whining.You quote one person and attribute this to "objectivists." You will have to ask audiohobby what he meant by saying AJ had captured it--and I don't think you interpreted the whole sensibly anyway. Stop whining.
If you think calling people "lunatic fringe" is being civil, you have a strange idea of civility.
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
Pat D-Cake,The only one whining here is YOU! Poor me I'm an objectivist and thetubeguy1954 is attributing remarks made by POLLYinFLA to me, WAAAAAAAAA.
Thetubeguy1954 acts as though the comments made by "some" lunatic-fringe objectivist applies to "every" lunatic-fringe objectivist! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
Thetubeguy1954 quotes one lunatic-fringe objectivists person and attributes this to all lunatic-fringe objectivists. Thetubeguy1954 should ask audiohobby what he meant by saying AJ had captured it--and besides I don't think thetubeguy1954 interpreted the whole sensibly anyway and everyone knows I'm always right! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
If thetubeguy1954 thinks calling people "lunatic fringe" is being civil, he has a strange idea of civility....
Pat D-Cake I'll respond to the long winded whine by saying when I think of the many other things I could call you and your fellow lunatic-fringe objectivists. Trust me calling you lunatic-fringe is being civil :^)
Thetubeguy1954
A number of us holding different perspectives have been pointing this out to you in different ways for days."when I think of the many other things I could call you and your fellow lunatic-fringe objectivists. Trust me calling you lunatic-fringe is being civil :^)"
It's still just argumentem ad hominem against me, nothing to prove your own hearing abilities. Strong language doesn't constitute an argument.
____________________________________________________
"Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony."
------Heraclitus of Ephesis (fl. 504-500 BC), trans. Wheelwright.
Pat,You really need to let this morbid obession with me go. Are you going to start coming to Orlando and stalking me next? I readily admitted here: http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/prophead/messages/30019.html
That posting about you being a Hypocrite is something I should have refrained from. How many times do you need to read or hear that before it sinks in? You're starting to worry me with this obsession you have with having to respond to almost everything I write. You are a sick demented man, who cannot refrain from having the last word and beating a dead horse. I believe this is the 2nd time I've told you personally and the 3rd time altogether that I stated, I should have refrained from posting about you being a Hypocrite! Not because you aren't a hypocrite, that you are, but rather because it had nothing to really do with my actual topic THE BIGGEST LIES OBJECTIVISTS TELL ABOUT SUBJECTIVISTS.
Now how many more times are you going to ask the same question? Hmmmm????
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: