|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
64.222.185.130
In Reply to: And here's what I know posted by Bob Lee (QSC) on March 21, 2007 at 11:44:57:
">There is a reason studios like Abbey Road Studio do not use pro amps
to master with
They use Classe amps...<And what is the reason?"
Perhaps that they can afford them?
If I win the lottery I'll drive a Lamborghini or Bentley, or even a mundane Mercedes SLK if it's a 'small' payout. Until then I'll survive with an Acura. It's one thing to make recommendations based on a money is no object basis, another entirely for the rest of us.
Follow Ups:
"> There is a reason studios like Abbey Road Studio do not use pro amps
to master with
They use Classe amps... <And what is the reason?"
If I remember, they were given to them. Same with B&W loudspeakers. It is called marketing.
Oh, and I forget to mention that we compared last week-end a Classé CA-M400 versus the best from Crown. No discernable difference. We swith the Crown to a gainclone. The gainclone was the winner hands down. More dynamic, better imaging, better micro dynamics, more resolution.
What loudspeakers were you doing your tests with? Bose?
:)
I am kidding on that but I am curious what loudspeakers you were
using to AB
Those chip amps are great for bi-amped little studio monitorsNational semiconductor has a real winner with those chip designs
This is the loudspeakers:http://images.andale.com/f2/115/106/3730802/2007/2/5/ENCEINTE_UNE.jpg
Ok they look like they would give an accurate presentationI noted all the Classe gear in the backround
:)
At least, better than Bose's stuff! :-)
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: