|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
83.84.181.88
In Reply to: Eight hours later and all we see below is bluster: "It's a con" summarizes nicely. posted by clarkjohnsen on March 21, 2007 at 10:54:37:
I asked where that acceptable (technical) explanation is, two years after you were willing to place a bet that it would appear any time soon. Where is it, show us! I mean, one that holds water when being put to the test.
Follow Ups:
An acceptable (technical) explanation will never be available.I still can't figure out why my Fruity Pepples from the grocery store make my transistor radio sound like a mega buck vacuum tube system with floor standing speakers. I think I'll repackage the colorful cereal and sell them to "audiophiles".
...as they say. ;-)
...the explanation would "appear"? That would be frightfully stupid of the proprietors, who wish to sell the technology they discovered and understand.Finally, who are you to make such demands on others?
The second part of yout sentence then was ...understood and recognized "by a public resistant to growth, a public enmeshed in the gears of accepted ways, a public subservient to whatever entrenched "scientific" bureaucracies tell them is absolutely, forever true. In short, people such as yourself."
Now tell me, Clark, how is that public supposed to be able to understand and recognize when the mechanism is kept a secret? How would you be able to win that bet of yours if no explanation is made public? Just wondering.
Klaus
if you, or your "expert witnesses", go and listen to Shepard's tone, does what you/they hear make it a really continously descending tone?If you, or your "expert witnesses", go and experience the Franssen illusion, does what you/they perceive make the speaker play that ACTUALLY DOES NOT PLAY ?
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: