Isolation Ward

• And... - kerr 09:48:44 02/17/07 (4)
  In Reply to: posted by on December , at :

  ...isn't the statement "The Tice Clock did nothing" in itself a testable claim that the claimant must prove before stating it? At least they have to prove it around here! Hell, I don't even say that oranges are different from apples around here unless I've tested it 6 ways from sunday.

  Gotta be careful throwing those claims around! :)
  
  

  ---

  • Indeed, Nut and his henchman made testable claims -- and in the test, they were found lacking altogether! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:48:45 02/17/07 (3)
    In Reply to: posted by on December , at :

    x
    
    

    ---

    • henchmen? ...... HeNcHmEn! ...... HENCHMEN ! ...... I don't need no stinkin' henchmen! - Richard BassNut Greene 09:48:46 02/17/07 (2)
      In Reply to: posted by on December , at :

      I'm comin' to get you all by myself.

      Where do you live?

      If you don't tell me, I'll just ask around and find out who audio salesmen think is their most gullible customer in America.
      That would be you.
      .
      .
      .
      
      Richard BassNut Greene
      Subjective Audiophile 2007
      
      

      ---

      • Look, we all recognize it when a blowhard can't supply the same sort of "proof" he demands from others. BUT... - clarkjohnsen 09:48:46 02/17/07 (1)
        In Reply to: posted by on December , at :

        ...is that any reason to get personal? "...their most gullible customer in America. That would be you."

        Guess it is, if one lacks even the slightest basis on which to rest his case, when one is disposed to be defensive about it.

        clark

        
        
        
        

        ---

        • Typical Clark "Catch 22" (Everything requires proof ... but no test is done right ... unless Clark likes the results) - Richard BassNut Greene 09:48:47 02/17/07 (0)
          In Reply to: posted by on December , at :

          Any audibility claim Clark agrees with = needs no proof

          Proof of audibility is never needed for subjective auditions.

          If any objective audibility tests are done, they are never good enough ... unless Clark likes the results = then their methodology is "perfect"!

          You're bias is showing.
          ,
          ,
          ,
          ,
          Richard BassNut Greene
          Subjective Audiophile 2007
          
          

          ---

Post a Followup:

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Parts Connexion

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---