|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
203.129.37.217
In Reply to: Re: depends, as usual on how you define most stuff 1926 lf posted by freddyi on April 13, 2007 at 14:56:10:
on that basis.and 20 would be a LOT better even IF there's not much there that's MUSIC, but may be acoustics, and thus part of the verissimilitude!
Also the extra capability helsp with getting tones further UP right.
For orchestral music, 30 or so is FINE, but not IMO for organ pedals.
WarmestTimbo in Oz
The Skyptical Mensurer and Audio ScroungerAnd gladly would he learn and gladly teach - Chaucer. ;-)!
'Still not saluting.'
Follow Ups:
Greets!Yeah, as music reproduction BW increased I had to keep lowering my sub's tuning from its initial mid '30s to accommodate it, with ~16 Hz being the point of diminishing returns until movie LFE and a few music CDs with cannon fire, etc., came along. Now we need ~flat in-room to near DC to experience all the LF BW that some recordings have, so either a multiple driver IB or numerous electronically EQ'd sealed cabs spread around the room are the only viable options that come to mind.
and accept lower spl but pretty good phase to 16? got a transform whose corner would like ~2CF box with low efficiency 15 like the Chinese Dayton. 2-15 might be ok (?)
Greets!If you mean Linkwitz transformed, I said EQ'd sealed, so it would be fine if enough drivers are used, whether all in one cab or as Earl G. prefers, multiple cabs scattered around the room.
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: