|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
76.16.75.85
In Reply to: tapped horns vs 1/4 wave length posted by jnorv on April 6, 2007 at 21:13:27:
HiAs Bill suggests, bass horns are usually a quarter wavelength long at the low cutoff.
Like wise the Tapped horn is approximately a quarter wave length long at its low cutoff.
Horns are resonant devices like a transmission line but horns have sufficient resistance to damp the resonances into insignificance.
When a horn mouth is too small for example, these resonances are unmasked and when the peak to dip magnitude reaches some level, it is unacceptable.
In the case of the small bass horn, the lowest peak is the quarter wave resonance, the velocity and pressure distribution are as is shown on Martin’s site for a T-line.
The tapped horn has both sides of the driver in the horn path, one face is at the “normal” end for a horn, the other side (opposite acoustic phase) intersects the horn, usually near the mouth.
At the low cutoff, the acoustic path between the two side comprises about 90 degrees of phase, leaving about 90 degrees difference between the front and back radiations where they sum within the horn. At the low cutoff, because of the phase shift, effectively only one side of the radiator at the far end feels the load from the quarter wave resonance.
As the frequency climbs and where the big dip would normally be, now, the acoustic path is about 180 degrees and both sided of the radiator add in phase, driving the horn with a larger surface area. That increase in driving area (ideally) offsets the big wide dip in radiation resistance between the first two peaks.
It is a case where the resistance at both ends of a horn sets the Q of the resonance’s, the Tapped horn allows the driver end source resistance to in effect change with frequency to accommodate the change in the horn resistance.An unexpected side effect of a variable source in the Tapped horn is the measured group delay for a given corner frequency, is less than a Vented box and even a conventional horn with the same LF corners.
The Tapped horn is only useful when a conventional horn is enough smaller than ideal to have large peaks and dips. When size is no object, a regular horn can be made to be more efficient.
There is some additional info on them and some examples at our web site
http://www.danleysoundlabs.com/
Follow Ups:
When is size not limiting in subbass horns? The question would be at what size horn IS IT WORTH going with a regular horn vs a tapped horn for more efficiency? Would it be 1/2 lambda certainly it would not be the ideal = full size horn. Noticed four TH115s give 50% efficiency vs needed 6 lab subs to do the same. So hard to beat this design. No need to be so humble Tom!!
Hi Bill, NicolasThe Tapped horn IS sort of a free lunch so far as the bottom portion of a bass horns response is concerned. For a given size box and low corner, you can make more sound per Watt, per excursion limit this way.
Generally, one can get two octaves or more of reasonably flat response, which is normally enough for a woofer. Tapped horns do not generally go as far above the low cutoff as regular horns can but you can combine one with another “upper range” horn.
Below the quarter wave low cutoff, the roll off slope eventually reaches between 18 and 24 dB per octave slope, not as gradual as a sealed box, not as steep as a vented box.The TH215 while still smaller than a LAB sub, would be a better comparison as it has a lower corner F than the TH-115.
http://www.danleysoundlabs.com/pdf/Danley TH-215 Spec Sheet_r3.pdf
Best,Tom
In case Tom doesn't respond, there's still no such thing as a free lunch. A TH115 has higher sensitivity and smoother response within its passband than a Lab, but that passband is also much narrower. Add enough Labs and they'll be just as sensitive, with response just as flat, and they'll go an octave lower to boot. You get to full sensitivity with fewer TH115s, but they also won't go as low, no matter how many you use. It's all a matter of making specific compromises to achieve specific goals.
Agree Bill there is no fre lunch but still I hate to carry more cabs than necessary. Tapped horns are an easy built too and although Tom will/should get the patent for horns. It does not mean a few for personal use will hurt,
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: