|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.214.20.129
In Reply to: Re: T90a -T90aex posted by GindinE on February 11, 2007 at 16:45:57:
Ed, Kloss is right about the T925a.That is the tweeter I have and I originally purchased them because, of the tweeters Fostex made at that time the sensitivity of the T925a was the best match to my system. Using them in your system would only require a slight pad on the mid range with no additional filtering to the low and high pass of the midbass and tweeter.
While I understand the T500 mkII is superior sounding, the T925a is a HUGE improvement over the fane while costing far less than the T500.
You could listen to mine any time.
Follow Ups:
Iso,
925 is 108db and costs $263. 900 is 106 db and costs $338. So the price difference is insignificant. For a Edgarhorn type system, what do you recommend?
Ed
I can only speak about the T925a, which are the ones I've been using for years and that I like. I haven't heard the other models so I really can't make any informed comments.Mikelakers speaks highly of the 500 mkII and I think he probably has an exceptional ear so his input carries good amount of weight.
I think, based on what I've heard and read that the T925a is a great value in the Fostex tweeter hierarchy and the improvement over the Fanes is a considerable one. Also the output difference between the 925 and the 900 doesn't seem like much, but I'd bet you'd miss that last little bit, especially coming from the 112-115 of the fanes.
Eso,
you never stopped by and never listened to my system, you rascal. Promisses, promisses...
Ed
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: