|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
209.165.51.120
In Reply to: Re: Absolutely none on mine or the one I bought my friend. (nt) posted by Adam Verver on December 22, 2004 at 19:25:44:
I feel it *is* a flawless recording otherwise, I'm just increasingly concerned that Telarc's stable of conductors--Spano, Jarvi, and Botstein--are too tasteful for their own good.
Follow Ups:
Mr. Michael Bishop has kindly responded to my inquiry about the source of the 60 Hz buzzing during the silent moments of Telarc's Berlioz Requiem. It is the old lighting system at the Woodruff Performing Arts Center: both transformers and fixtures were buzzing.He said: " Believe me, the noise was quite an annoyance and distraction to us at the session. When we found we could do nothing about the noise, we had to move on with the session."
I fully sympathize with this dilemma, and I thank him for clarifying this issue. I am also quite impressed by the integrity of Telarc's engineers for not marring the purity of the DSD recording by post-processing the data to remove the buzz. This could have been done (as it is often done by lesser labels) but would have most likely required a conversion to PCM (since I doubt such filters exist for DSD editors) then back to DSD.
for your post, from people who turned out to be wrong!! Some should step up and say they are sorry.
Many DSD recording have similar problem.
Such as the Channel Classic sampler.
other than that high resolution recording - pcm or DSD - will certainly reveal more of the detail, both wanted AND unwanted.
Best Regards,
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: