|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.65.40.90
In Reply to: autorun posted by tunenut on April 17, 2007 at 10:13:11:
We agree more than we disagree. But I remember this from when SonyBMG first went into damage control mode, and guess what, it's still posted on their FAQ page devoted to the XCP/MediaMax issue. You may very well be correct about this, and I probably saw conflicting reports about this, but if what you're saying is true, they're still lying about these discs. The Wikipedia page I linked to in my initial post in the thread does contain links to pages that offer advice on circumventing the rootkit, but I remain curious, as I'm still not 100% on whether or not these CDs can be safely & properly used even with autorun disabled. I sure don't trust them. If you're right, then why would they still have this posted on their FAQ site?"When listening to music directly off the disc, you must use the player provided on the disc. Attempting to play the audio on the disc (while the disc is spinning in the computer drive) with another player (i.e. Windows Media Player, Real Player, iTunes) will result in distorted sound."
Follow Ups:
They are being a little deceptive.If you put one of these disks in your computer even one time without disabling autorun, there is no telling what crap they might install. Once a rootkit is installed, it may act to prevent proper playback of the WAV files on this computer using any normal playback software. And once it is on there, you're screwed, it's tough to remove a rootkit.
However, if autorun is disabled from the very first time you insert this disk, nothing can be installed on your computer from this disk. In this case, you can play the WAV files using any normal CD software including Windows Media Player etc.
It is in their interest to make people think they cannot play these files or rip them, that they are stuck with the DRM files.
And since most people don't mess with the registry, in most cases people will be stuck with the DRM files.
But people with just a little computer savvy will not. So I do not believe these are completely honest statements that they have written.
How is it in their interest to continue even a low level of deception?
In my opinion, the content companies have always tried to present an image of unbreakable copy protection. And the copy protection on popular media is all cracked. DVDs are cracked. SACDs are not. But if any substantial number of people bought SACDs, they'd be cracked too.But the companies will not ever admit any vulnerability in their copy protection schemes. That would make the whole effort seem pointless. So they posture as though they have taken effective measures.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: