|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.30.248.240
In Reply to: Sibelius, Bartok... nt posted by clarkjohnsen on March 1, 2007 at 09:28:10:
was, of course, Stravinsky. He was only serial for a while, and almost never atonal--even when serial--so perhaps he doesn't qualify.
Follow Ups:
Wow, I love Stravinsky, do not care for Shokastovich at all, I suppose I do not care much for his brand of atonal music, but saying that even his early compositions IMO do not have the quality of the likes of Stravinsky and Prokofiev.
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
Shostakovich isn't even *close* to atonal, and my post was largely about Stravinsky.
Put to down to a lack of musical education, I was speaking with my foot in my mouth! That said I love Stravinsky, but do not care much for Shostokavich.
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
Shostakovich atonal? No.
Bill Bailey
___________________________________________
See my stereo config ... but always looking for cost effective improvements
Put it down to lack of knowledge on my side! Thanks for the correction. As an aside, I love a lot of Stravinsky's reportoire and conversely there is not much that I warm to in Shostakovich reportoire.
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: