Digital Drive

Re: Sorry folks, I failed to clarify my position in a way you can relate to.

80.66.130.220

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Digital Drive ]

Werner

(A)

In Reply to: Sorry folks, I failed to clarify my position in a way you can relate to. posted by George Mann on November 24, 2006 at 02:21:28:

I'm still not with you. As far as I can see you failed to clarify your position to a bunch of experienced EEs.
Please explain "point of reference".
Please explain "shifts from one ... reference point to another"
Please explain "clearly skewed representation"
Please explain "the ability to present 2 or more levels of threshold simultaneously"
And please do so in a way that makes it clear that you are not discussing quantisation error and a lack of reconstruction filtering.
Also please define the sort of digital system you are comparing to the sort of analogue system. Is this about the mathematics of sampling and/or quantisation? About ADC/DAC chip limitations? About ADC/DAC systems? Mathematical analogue? Magnetic tape? LP?

bring back dynamic range

Follow Ups:

You people are hopeless, and I never should have expected you to understand! - George Mann 03:01:49 11/24/06 (5)
digital is perfect, ABSOLUTELY perfect!
- Nope, we know that it isn't perfect - Ted Smith 09:22:30 11/24/06 (4)
  Howdy
  If you had read our posts you would know that. Werner, myself, and others here are well aware of the shortcomings (and strengths for that matter) of digital. Also, if you note, we are willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, but so far we haven't found common terminology to really understand what you are trying to say.
  -Ted
  - And I'm afraid you never will. nt. - George Mann 11:25:09 11/24/06 (3)
    nt.
    - We know the standard technology and terminology, why do you give up so easily? [nt] - Ted Smith 11:31:46 11/24/06 (2)
      - It would be best just to drop the subject. Here's why... - George Mann 12:06:49 11/24/06 (1)
        
        In Reply to: We know the standard technology and terminology, why do you give up so easily? [nt] posted by Ted Smith on November 24, 2006 at 11:31:46:
        
        Not only have you people disrespected my knowledge on the subject, the complexity of the issue is apparently beyond your ability to understand.
        I will not be participating in this thread any further.
        
        You might get some respect if you showed others some... - Ted Smith 12:47:13 11/24/06 (0)
        
        In Reply to: It would be best just to drop the subject. Here's why... posted by George Mann on November 24, 2006 at 12:06:49:
        
        Howdy
        If you know the standard terminology why don't you use it? If you don't know the standard terminology or even attempt to use it you'll find it very hard to communicate in the future.
        Despite your protestations I and others here obviously know a lot more than you give us credit for and despite misunderstandings at times we still manage to discus technical matters.
        -Ted

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers

[ K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers Forum ]

You can not post to an archived thread.