|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
4.255.241.86
In Reply to: Esoterica Is Its Own Reward. posted by jbwebs on May 8, 2007 at 10:53:44:
Well, looks like I stirred up the expected hornets nest. The thing I always find interesting in these discussions is that almost no one ever changes "sides". It is like an atheist arguing with a Christian about the existence of God. There just isn't enough common ground between the two points of view to have a good debate.Anyway, FTR I believe there are a lot of tweaks that make a difference in the quality of the listening experience, and I believe that there is a lot of very worthwhile high end gear out there. I just wish that people would factor in the very subjective nature of hearing when making expensive decisions.
Follow Ups:
...- over a at least a few days if not longer - before buying or upgrading is the key to audio happiness.
having a best of show is a sham.
...come on now.Is the American Idol voting a sham?
Are the "People's Choice Awards" a sham?
Ok, so what's you point?
Sometimes the best of show awards are more about showmanship than great sound.
You even put on a pretty good spin job at that, since you know exactly where I was going.
...sooner or later something will stick.And you'll be right.
Or at least I'll agree with you.
I could care less if you agree with me. like James Carville, you are so used to being the spinning little ankle biter that you are, that you are dizzy from it. Every time someone brings up something that can threaten the credibility of a reviewer or a magazine, you are the first to either bite their head off or further muddy the water.At the show, a non audio buddy of mine said that the three turntable based systems that he had heard sounded great. He also went on to say that he could have identified them blindfolded. Wow! Needless to say, they were in the context of entirely different systems and rooms. It is just that I found that statement that he made quite interesting, to say the least. I also find it interesting that you would spin such a query into people voting on a singing show. Cute though.
Reviewers and audiophiles alike tend to be a very very opinionated bunch. They make glaring statments of how this and that makes huge differences. But when pressed, reviewers aren't confident enough that they can even definitively be able to identify the same piece they just reviewed with a blind test. Not a DBT. A blind test of that particular piece of equipment with any other. Oddly, my uninformed, uninitiated and uneducated in audio buddy could make and feel that he could back up such a claim. Woof!
...when you take yourself more seriously than I do.Where's your sense of humor?
Do run with what I had started. A non audio geek not only claimed to hear differences, but also claimed that he could substantiate them. Not bad considering that he is not a reviewer with only a brief period of time listening.I left my sense of humor where a self described subjectivist said that my speaker of choice sucked. Mind you, he had never actually heard them before. Now that I find humorous.
My best sound at the show was in Brooklyn. A live gig at a couple's home. They had a fantastic trio and a killer singer. She sang for the 30 or so lucky ones, through a set of Fender speakers on tower stands. Way better tonality and imaging than anything at the show, regardless of cost.
I listen to a lot of systems that I think are great, but just not great for me. One very easy, very simple example is that one can listen to the 10 foot tall Triangle Magellans and love them, - but if you don't have 10 feet of ceiling space in your 12 by 12 foot room, - well, - hey, they ain't for you...So sometimes, since this stuff is somebody's (manufacturers) artistic interpretation of a musical event, - we have a tendency to say things in a more dramatic and forceful way than we normally would about the reliability of a toaster oven. Some systems are (possibly) designed for a much more specific purpose, - like getting Mozart perfect: if so, - they're probably going to sound sucky for playing back the Clash...
The problem of leisure, what to do for pleasure. Ideal love a new purchase, a market of the senses. Dream of the perfect life.
Thanks Obie-Wan.
Well, I am an engineer...
.....That does explain a lot.Smile
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: