|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
207.200.116.133
In Reply to: Sorry I assumed he listened before writing a review -- I stand corrected posted by Richard BassNut Greene on February 12, 2007 at 08:28:30:
“Failing to do that is not fair to the product, and although I've probably never agreed with Clark before, trashing any tweak without listening is just as bad as a golden ear audiophile trashing a Pioneer receiver without ever listening to it.
That's just not Kosher.”I dunno, Richard. The question arises: Just how far can one walk down this road while maintaining a straight face? The audiophile community could do with a large dose of Scottish Common Sense. If you were to read of a product called the “sonic turd,” that purported to enhance the imaging characteristics of a stereo system by releasing methane into the atmosphere of one’s listening room, would you really have to audition the product before concluding that the manufacturer was full of shit? Subjectivists are fond of insisting that there are “no absolutes,” but in doing so they unwittingly create their own absolute, the very thing they so passionately wish to deny. :)
Follow Ups:
Brilliant intelligent clever sonic turds would sell.
Plain ole' sonic turds are for losers and cheapskates.
Methane WOULD affect the listening experience, IMHO.
.
.
.
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
"X rays are a hoax!" Now, that is 'Scottish Common Sense'.
By the way, 'Brilliant Pebbles' aren't pebbles, or even crushed common rocks. You should at least know what you are criticizing.
1) '"X rays are a hoax!"'Not to anyone familiar with modern medicine, and I’m unaware of *any* rational Scot who believes otherwise. If you’re suggesting that science is capable of shedding new light on various subjects then we would agree. (That’s merely stating the obvious.) But I’ll wager a case of Lafite that all the science in the world will never give universal credibility to many of the snake oil products hyped at this venue. :)
2) "By the way, 'Brilliant Pebbles' aren't pebbles, or even crushed common rocks. You should at least know what you are criticizing."I didn't mention the controversial pebbles so I’m afraid your meaning is lost on me. Are you confusing two different posts?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: