|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: What I've heard Siltech say... posted by Jim Smith on November 14, 2001 at 06:10:58:
Actually, the reason for starting this thread was to suggest if not another manufacturer could experiment with such a conductor and come out with a cheaper gold-silver line?
I am sure that Siltech has its good reasons for using gold-silver in its cables, so my BIG question:Why has nobody else tried to develop such a conductor, if the sound of Siltech is so gorgeous?
As I said in my earlier post, it cannot be the price of gold. $12 per gram is not so bad.
I read that Silversmith will come out with a Palladium conductor, which is nothing more what some people have in their teeth fillings or crowns: Platinum, gold and I guess mercury (some people will know better) So I hope that more manufacturers will start to experiment with gold in their conductors, when Siltech has such a good sounding cable. I know it takes more than just mixing gold and silver, or maybe not?
We will never know, as long as nobody but Siltech is doing this.
If I had the time and knowledge I would start to experiment with gold-silver or platinum-palladium-silver alloys.
Follow Ups:
Hmmm... I guess It's all about costs. But manufacturers surely will make them (gold, platinum or otherwise) if they think that there'll be buyers.
We don't know yet whether the improvement in sound is due to the gold or just a superior geometry and silver purity etc..It is very likely that the gold-plating is not the reason. Just as the effect of silver-plated copper is not significant.
We don't know yet whether the improvement in sound is due to the gold or just a superior geometry and silver purity etc..It is very likely that the gold-plating is not the reason. Just as the effect of silver-plated copper is not significant.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: