|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: Gold is not the best conductor... to add posted by john on November 13, 2001 at 22:27:55:
Well I do not get it, I guess. The Siltech G5 is one of the best cables I ever heard, but its a gold-silver alloy and here are two people telling me that the use of gold is not recommended.
Have the people not read my post I wonder?
I was not speaking about pure gold, but an silver-gold alloy like Siltech uses.
I guess they have found that an alloy containing gold does just the opposite what people claim here: it is not degrading the sound, but improving it!!
Follow Ups:
If siltech uses a silver-gold combination, then I guess they made use of the gold as a corrosion-preventive material. Correct me if I'm wrong here - my comment was based on studies and technical papers I've read on using gold, silver and copper.Have you tried comparing the Siltech with another silver only conductor interconnect?
Yes, many of the cables I tried were silver only. Like the Acoustic Zen.
Is it? This is not a universal opinion. Gold cladding, Cryo, and super pure wire does not always make the best cable. Transparent uses copper, now what?
I never wanted to suggest of course that Siltech has the best cable out there. It is very good and from what I just read about the Transparent Opus, it seems not to justify the price tag.
Yes, copper makes an excellent conductor also, I enjoy the copper Sahauro cables very much.
According to Siltech, although gold has a lower conductive value than
silver, it has the ability to reduce what Siltech calls micro level
distortion. Therefor by filling gold at an atomic level in a silver
conductor, they are able to combine the strengths of these two
metals.
nt
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: