Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Tweakers' Asylum

Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: But wait: there's more...

Posted by rivervalley817 on October 19, 2020 at 08:41:46:

'the negative terminal of the 22uF cap is tied to the positive terminal of the DC voltage source'

yes, that's the direction of the current flow ... the whole DC circuit 'flows' to the positive of the line level source, which actually carries the 'negative' audio signal right? the line level's negative flows to the negative terminal of the battery ... are you saying the battery should be reversed as well?

when you say it converts that bi-polar cap to a resistor I agree, but that circuit is also treating the battery as if it was a 'pre-charged' capacitor, and the whole thing is dumping DC into the line level source in reverse ... I was thinking that bi-polar cap should just be a high value resistor instead ... on the other hand it doesn't make much sense to reverse charge the line level output ... that seems like 'bad ju-ju' to me

regards,