Tube DIY Asylum

Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: GZ34: getting too much voltage drop

Posted by sideliner on February 11, 2017 at 18:35:35:
You are right, I thought more about this after I posted my last response and it occurred to me that the losses incurred in the filter from input to output can only be the resistive losses in the inductor (DCR) and/or resistors. From this realization alone it's obvious that the difference between 1.41x Vrms and 0.9x Vrms in the two types of filters is due to the topology.

The capacitor input simply charges to the peak value of the voltage waveform, hence the x1.41 factor. So to correct my earlier statement, the voltage at the output of the filter is that of the input minus the resistive losses of the chokes and resistors which of course depends on the current draw of the amp.

So, the voltage of 290V present at the rectifier's cathode is actually in line with the expected result.