Tube DIY Asylum

Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

I should probably stay out of this but....

Posted by Steve O on January 28, 2013 at 18:34:11:
...Eric Barbour discusses the ridges or "dams" in tube bases in his article on the 6550 and KT88 in issue #6 of Vacuum Tube Valley (winter, 1997). On page 22, column 3, paragraph 1 he states "Thanks to the large low-loss base with molded-in dams between the pins to discourage leakage currents, the 6550 was rated for 600 volts on the plate and 400 volts on the screen." I don't believe VTV back issues are on Millett's site and you may not consider Barbour an authority (he provides no references) but it's in writing and was published.