Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: Objective Measurement Results for Cables

Posted by bjh on October 1, 2007 at 13:31:16:

It would be a promising development to see the "multitone test signal" make available for replication purposes; actual measurements would appear to be trivial.

One interesting aspect of the graphs in Part 5, i.e. Figures 6.7 and 6.8 is that the right-hand plots, those taken at the load, would appear (at least by superfical appearance) to represent a net sum increase in energy compared to the plots taken at the source; I'm assuming the y-axis (SPL-db), can be construed as a measure of energy.

Assuming this is the case (difference plots would help) my only guess for the apparent paradox would be that the additional enegry is Back EMF that is attenuated by the cable (to account for the lesser energy at the source).