Computer Audio Asylum

Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Beethoven 9th PSO, Steinberg, 1970 FM)Revox 96/24 download

Posted by IslandLizard on July 27, 2011 at 19:40:01:
Thanks for some clarifications. I've heard live recordings from the Edirol, and know the mics and positioning are key to better sound. The ADCs are not the limiting factor there.

Now using the Edirol for archive digitalization gives the story another twist. I'll have to check the Edirol specs again.

I use a Samson H4 for "field" recordings, but would be hesitant using it for line-input AD conversions (Opamps etc.). I tend to rely on my M-Audio Delta Audiophile 2496 for AD or DA conversions.

I understand you had nothing to do with tape choice. There was quite a selection around those days (among the usual suspects such as BASF, AGFA, 3M, Ampex, and Maxell, "Sony" arose with SLH and later ULH which did sound really good, but developed mechanical problems later (SLH first, which was later replaced by ULH, being even worse mechanically with the backcoating sticking to the magnetic front-side). I read the mile-long thread on that issue...

I was wondering why the one-shot deal on recording from these old tapes.

What is causing the noise modulation? Noise level is louder on soft passages, then reduces when the RMS rises. Not just perception, I hear the breathing.

Thanks for shining any light on these.