|
OTL Asylum OTL, Output Transformerless Amplifier User Group. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
New installation of my A-S OTL amps
Posted by jeffreybehr on June 14, 2019 at 20:36:30:
I have a pair of M-60/3.3s (45 Watts into 4 Ohms) along with a pair of 96dB-sensitive Serenity Super-7 speakers.. I felt they would be an excellent pairing, and they have been; including this combo, my system has NEVER sounded better.. I also have a pair of MA-1/3.1s (135 Watts into 4 ohms) that I bought last year to drive my Quad '2905s.. Both pairs of amps have essentially identical upgrades in coupling and PS-bypass caps, and altho the 3.3s may have less measured distortion according to A-S, I consider the two versions to be equal in sonic qualty.
Altho I have the MA-1s listed for sale, I got to thinking that as often as I change speakers--on average, maybe every two years--and as convinced as I was a couple years ago that I would buy a pair of Revel Ultima2 Salon2s in the spring/summer of '18, that the MA-1s and not the M-60s might be the more-flexible OTL amps to keep.. This afternoon I switched amps and since we in Phoenix are in the armpit of summer AND the A-S OTLs will operate perfectly with fewer than full sets of tubes*, I installed only THREE pairs of output tubes (Winged-Cs this time) in each amp.. Both amps nulled to zero quickly with 6 instead of 14 tubes, and initial listening results are quite positive.
I believe this is going to work! That is, I still have a pair of excellent-sounding A-S OTLs driving my highly sensitive Super-7s, but now I have the option of succesfully driving much-less-sensitive speakers with them in addition to saving electricity money in the summer.. It's a win-win! ... :-)
What do you think?
* while, of course, delivering less-than-specified maximum power