Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

I would tend to agree

Posted by sbrians on November 26, 2022 at 13:16:37:
I'm using 3.3s. I bought them cheap years ago and sent them in for re-glue. 1.6s may be more coherent. But I like a fun, enjoyable sound, not just coherence or imaging.
I've heard very coherent gunned 1.6s which were great, but I prefer my 3.3s.
I've also heard an expensive ML system that had perfect imaging - I could see each member of Steely Dan standing around the stage. That was amazing thing that I will alway remember, but it was not fun to me like Maggies are.