Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: LDW 1 woofers (Little Dipolar Woofer) post found on FB,

Posted by emailtim on October 19, 2020 at 09:14:04:
The comments came off to me as advertising gimmick "name dropping". Phrases like "tested with a Pass Labs amp" doesn't make it any more of a Pass Labs' design then my OB/Dipole subs tested with a Mark Levinson or Jeffrey Rowland amp make it a ML or JR sub.
I see the diagram now indicates it as a cardioid design. I still think the diagram is backwards though if you actually measure the radiation pattern vs the SPL in the constricted port.
From Linkwitz Labs, U-Frame on right:
H-Frame and U-Frame:
That being said, the end result is how it sounds. Supposedly, there are reviews in the works.