Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Test of LRS on Audio Science Review website

Posted by Aspheric on September 25, 2020 at 05:17:33:
I also follow the Audio Science Review website. They pursue a finely crafted objective analysis of equipment. And objective is where their approach runs into problems.

For example, I own a Topping D50s DAC that tested excellent on their scale and is strongly recommended. Closely comparing it to my other DAC, which is a bit more expensive, the sound is thin, shallow and much less detailed.

Pure measurement does not present the whole story in audio.