Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: Should I replace my passive preamp with tubes?

Posted by ghost4man on March 23, 2017 at 22:17:50:

All this talk about using a pre which is a valve sounding much better when used in conjunction with maggies is not something that I really subscribe to.

My feeling has always been that a a pre, regardless of the electronic architecture should be as neutral as possible.

I was speaking to a colleague the other day who spent 10k for a valve pre - Audio Research Reference - because he liked the warmer valve sound.

I remarked to him that he preferred the sound to be coloured. He agreed.

So he sold his Lightspeed LDR passive pre, which is about as neutral a pre as you will get because it was in his eyes a bit too raw for him. Speak to other people and the LDR gives an amazing combo with maggies.