Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Inmate Central

Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: Scientific justification of stupid?

Posted by Inmate51 on November 21, 2020 at 12:17:57:

Those charts don't tell anyone anything other than aggregate totals. As such, they're nearly useless from a scientific standpoint, and are useless to even a reasonably intelligent layman. They only appeal to the non-thinkers. They're over-simplified to the point where they can make the nearly-useless TV news story, which typically consists of three or four headline sentences, along with some rehashing of past stories (just in case we forgot and need to be reminded), and the reporter's commentary regarding their approval, disapproval or INTERPRETATION of a person's comments. At least on the "major" networks, "news" these days (for at least the past couple of decades, maybe longer) is just plain pathetic, and biased toward one "side" or the other.

Question: WHERE are the new "widespread" cases of the China virus prevalent? WHAT demographics? What locales? Why? I want details! All thinking people want to know. This what is sometimes called "investigative reporting". It's easy to be a "Monday morning quarterback", but where were those people at the moment the decision needed to be made?!

I want USEFUL data!