Home
AudioAsylum Trader
MagneQuest/Peerless Forum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

Re: EXO-173 progress

Posted by keto on May 11, 2004 at 15:53:44:

Hey, Douglas. The 6.8uFs ground to the output cathode? and the 50K ct to earth?

Revisiting my own EXO-173, the WW pot in the shared, PP2A3 cathode is a very bad idea, methinks. At least it sounded that way. A current source (or bypassed resistor) and shared filament secondaries is better, provided you have a means of adjusting current, which is what your "dealie" would do, right?

My perceptions are definitely on the move, and I look forward to reworking the EXO173-loaded (the "reference") of my two amps.

A simple solution would be shared cathodes, and following Gary Pimm's lead, measuring exact DCRs of the two OPT primary halves, at operating temperature (not voltage!) and adding a precision resistor to even them up. Then with a well matched pair of tubes, you'd be very ballparky wrt to DC offset, alternating between the pair to see which configuration is quietest. Quietest in my universe means DC offset null, which may be completely wrong. I don't have a way of measuring it otherwise, or the interest in carefully and extensively probing and recording high voltages.

Or, how about a 60mA CCS (or appropriate bypassed resistor) on each of the two filament potentials, to null filament humm with a high impedance "center tap"?

Thanks for the explanation of the 4-tap item. --keto