Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

As for me...

Posted by E-Stat on September 7, 2020 at 10:09:53:
I find 96/24 to offer the best overall compromise in true musical resolution. If a recording is mastered in 192/24 as are many classical titles, I choose that because downsampling involves compromises. I have no interest in upsampling even when that "softens" the results as you find with DSD content. I'll take the original.

I have many 176/24 recordings that were originally released in SACD. DXD was originally introduced for editing SACD content.