Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Yes, somewhat unique

Posted by Doug Schneider on April 3, 2020 at 16:27:14:
Hi,

I'm not sure it's currently based on the Tact work. Last November, when I sat down for coffee with Peter Lyngdorf, he told me that in the early 2000s, he scrapped all the room-correction work they had done up till then, hired 30 developers, and rebuilt the software with what he referred to as a "time based" correction approach, which they weren't using before. Now, whether this "time based" approach is the same or even similar, I have no idea -- lots of people call different aspects of audio "time based." But this is to say, I don't think it's an outgrowth of the Tact system anymore.

Doug Schneider
SoundStage!