Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Thanks for posting the link

Posted by Isaak J. Garvey on March 18, 2017 at 13:24:30:
Convincing? That is the understatement of the decade.

The reason TAS and Stereophile are big fans of promoting proprietary formats that support manufacturers is because that is where there bread is buttered. Create demand, increase ad revenue potential by a considerable amount, and then when the whole thing collapses, move on on the next buzzword. Still waiting for those 10,000 DSD downloads.

"Future-Proof"? That is a good one! How about how they called the Schiit Yggy DAC "obsolete", and expressed "frustration" that the Bryston BDA-3 DAC, which measured perfectly, did not decode MQA'.

It's all a good laugh.