Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

The point is to discuss the merits of an emerging product that is starting to penetrate the market

Posted by Dave_K on November 3, 2016 at 11:07:23:

If this was just some standalone product I wouldn't care. MQA deserves extra scrutiny since it aims to replace current delivery formats, and its end goal is to control the whole digital audio chain from recording to playback. It has the potential, if widely adopted, to affect every consumer of digital audio. That's why so many people are talking about it. Beyond that, the marketing of MQA has been confusing, sometimes contradictory, dare I say a bit shifty. So that's leading to some skepticism.