Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: MQA files sound very good on a good

Posted by Jim Austin on October 29, 2016 at 11:48:27:

>>You Stereophile associated posters need to get off your MQA horse by not just reporting what Bob Stuart and associates say, but consider the interests of consumers who have so far not been able to assess properly the pros and cons of the format.<<

My feeling is that we're dealing on these forums not with impartial consumers who lack information but with critics who have wet their minds set against MQA for whatever reason. No matter what information is provided, they'll remain firm in their positions.

But maybe I'm wrong at least in a few cases, perhaps in yours. So, please help me provide what you're looking for. How can we best serve "the interests of consumers who have so far not been able to assess properly the pros and cons of the format"? The goal of my interview--and the Stereophile piece posted today--was to do precisely that. What have we missed? What information or insight are you seeking that hasn't been provided?