Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

Apparently you can't read.

Posted by Pat D on March 3, 2011 at 05:33:32:

My post quite explicitly made a distinction between reviewing and designing. Do you want to read the text again? Here it is.

"In any case, I find it a little strange to give such a title to any audio reviewer. I'd look to Paul Klipsch, Peter Walker, Edgar Villchur, and others who made advances in design and/or manufactured excellent equipment."

I should point out that HP started HP in 1973 and JGH started S'phile in 1962. HP was a latecomer. So was JGH for that matter. Audio magazine began in 1947. High Fidelity magazine started in 1951. Stereo Review began in 1958.

But I also said I wouldn't give the title of 'father of the high end' to any reviewer. Why should I?