Amp/Preamp Asylum

Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: But beware ...

Posted by Mick Wolfe on May 4, 2022 at 08:08:38:
I dismissed that negative review long ago by simply listening to the amp. If it would have failed that test, it would have been returned. I think they also gave a negative review to a much pricier GaN amp. Maybe the one sold by Underwood, but I'm not sure. Bottom line is that all my testing is done by ear. I'm sure my SET would receive a negative review spec-wise as well. I really have little use for that site to be honest, but it's an each to his own hobby and of course, YMMV.