|
Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
RE: I tend to disagree
Posted by AbeCollins on May 15, 2011 at 18:54:55:
Are you trying to convince me and others that passive linestages are inferior in the lower-midrange? Or are you asking for our input? I already gave you mine.
Let me just say that I stand by my findings and don't feel the need to change my mind because some Arthur Salvatore had a recent revelation, or a change in taste.
It is a gross generalization to think that all passive linestages are inferior in the lower-midrange. It can also be said that the lower-midrange performance varies among even the best ACTIVE linestages in ACTIVE vs ACTIVE comparisons.
What I am fundamentally saying is that a properly setup system with a passive linestage can sound incredible and if someone perceives ACTIVE linestages as producing "better" lower-midrange performance, "in his system", that doesn't mean that I will come to the same conclusion for my system. I don't feel the need to agree with this generalization, nor have I heard it in my system.
Yes, there are preamps that will color the lower-midrange making it more prominent and perhaps more appealing to some but that doesn't necessarily make it "better".