Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: REVIEW: Jim Smith Get Better Sound Accessory posted by Leefy on November 20, 2008 at 17:35:50:
What exactly do you mean by this?
Do you mean:
A) the distance between the speakers is .83 times the distance from either speaker to the listening position;
or
B) the distance between the speakers is .83 times the distance the listening position is in front of the plane in which the 2 speakers lie.
In example A, the speakers are wider apart than they would be in the frequently suggested equilateral triangle arrangement and the angle between the 2 speakers, measured at the listening position, will be around 72 degrees. That's an angle suggested in one section of the Audio Physic setup instructions and one I've found to produce extremely good results in my setup. Provided the speakers aren't too far apart, this results in a near field type listening arrangement.
In example B the speakers are closer together than they would be in the frequently suggested equilateral triangle arrangement. This will usually result in a far field listening arrangement unless the speakers are extremely close.
Room size and layout, especially whether the speakers are located along the long or short dimensison of the room, can often make one of the above 2 placements impractical or even impossible.
David Aiken
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "…speakers were separated in a ratio of.83 compared to the listening distance…" - David Aiken 15:58:10 11/22/08 (23)
- either way, I hope you don't nod your head to the music! - dave c 12:53:15 11/23/08 (16)
- If you start with everything placed precisely, it matters less when your head moves...(nt) - mkuller 16:19:53 11/23/08 (0)
- RE: either way, I hope you don't nod your head to the music! - David Aiken 15:20:35 11/23/08 (13)
- Possibly, but... - dave c 19:58:22 11/23/08 (12)
- Not necessarily an argument against precision… - David Aiken 13:24:21 11/24/08 (0)
- What kind of audiophile would even think in such terms? [nt] - Wellfed 09:29:49 11/24/08 (10)
- errr... one with friends and family? - dave c 12:22:48 11/24/08 (9)
- I've actually been surprised to find MORE realistic sound when sitting off-axis. [nt] - Wellfed 14:21:51 11/24/08 (8)
- RE: I've actually been surprised to find MORE realistic sound when sitting off-axis. [nt] - Jim Smith 16:43:29 11/24/08 (7)
- Repealing the laws of physics seems to be my specialty these days… - Wellfed 20:14:04 11/24/08 (6)
- your ambition and capabilities know no bounds!! - dave c 02:26:45 11/25/08 (3)
- Ambition MIXED with serendipity along with some good ol' fashion horse sense I think… - Wellfed 09:03:08 11/25/08 (2)
- Especially if you have the lobes for it. - rick_m 09:14:29 11/25/08 (1)
- Thank you kindly… - Wellfed 10:10:14 11/25/08 (0)
- How does that saying go? - Jim Smith 20:20:22 11/24/08 (1)
- I'm glad you're not the curious type… - Wellfed 20:32:46 11/24/08 (0)
- RE: either way, I hope you don't nod your head to the music! - Jim Smith 14:20:12 11/23/08 (0)
- Taste - Jim Smith 00:24:14 11/23/08 (3)
- Y being about 83% of X - BS64 06:25:44 11/23/08 (0)
- RE: Taste - David Aiken 01:16:05 11/23/08 (1)
- RE: Taste - Jim Smith 08:12:40 11/23/08 (0)
- RE: "…speakers were separated in a ratio of.83 compared to the listening distance…" - Leefy 16:11:36 11/22/08 (1)
- Thanks for the info NT - David Aiken 01:16:54 11/23/08 (0)