Home Speaker Asylum

General speaker questions for audio and home theater.

In general the smaller the room, the more uneven the bass frequency response with monopole speakers

The room sizes I've used are rough estimates based on my experiences -- I didn't measure all the rooms involved:

In small (up to 200 square feet) and medium-sized rooms (200 to 400 square feet), reduced excitation of side-wall-to-side-wall and floor-to-ceiling standing waves gives dipoles an inherent advantage over monopole speakers in the bass frequencies.

In very large rooms (over 800 square feet) rough bass frequency response is not often a problem -- the problem in those rooms is usually generating enough bass output.

In large (400 to 800 square feet) or very large rooms (over 800 square feet) greater room reverberation times (compared with smaller rooms) can make dipole speakers sound artificially "spacious" in the midrange frequencies. I often don't enjoy dipole speakers for that reason -- but I know others who like that effect. This may have much more to do with dipole speaker placement in the room rather than inherent in a dipole design, but that's been my experience.

I do enjoy dipole bass because it reduces the room's effect and bass instruments usually sound much more lifelike. You can still get a nasty bass boom from the front to back wall standing waves but hopefully you can move your listening seat forward or backwards by a few feet to reduce the problem.

A tall ceiling (over 10-12 feet) could compound that problem (with all types of speakers there is often too much reverb with tall untreated ceilings). Remember that dipoles are not completely directional.

The best sounding speakers I've ever heard in an ordinary home were Legacy Whispers which have dipole bass up to 200-300Hz.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.